Tense Selfhoods – NIRS, EEG, and SpO₂
Tense Selfhoods – NIRS, EEG, and SpO₂
Decolonial Neuroscience OHBM 2025 Fesbe Sbnec Snf icmpc18
During states of sustained attentional focus and high-performance flow, SpO₂ levels between 94% and 97% are observed, indicating a slight increase in blood CO₂ (mild, controlled hypercapnia). This physiological state does not represent hypoxia but rather a fine-tuned ventilation-perfusion balance, resulting in:
- Cortical cerebral vasodilation, particularly in frontal regions;
- Increased cerebral blood flow (CBF);
- Improved local oxygenation (↑ OxyHb) and efficient oxygen release to active tissue, as described by the hemoglobin dissociation curve (Bohr effect);
- Greater emotional stability and embodied presence—ideal for the emergence of functional Selfhoods such as the Executor Self, Caregiver Self, or Flow Self.
In other words, slightly lower SpO₂ levels (94–97%) are consistent with optimized physiological focus**, unlike states of agitation (SpO₂ > 98%) or fatigue/hypoxia (SpO₂ < 93%)
Tense Selfhoods – NIRS EEG SpO₂
.
Table 1 – Functional Tensional Selves: NIRS, EEG and SpO₂
Tensional Self (EU) | Bioaffective Origin | Neuroaffective Function | Cortical Regions (via NIRS) | Expected EEG Patterns | Typical SpO₂ (at Rest) |
Executor Self (EU¹²) | Fear + Desire | Focused planning, goal-oriented action | DLPFC, SMA | Sustained frontal beta, low theta | 94–96% (functional focus) |
Perfectionist (EU¹⁶) | Fear + Control | Rigid self-control, fear of failure | DLPFC, ACC | Elevated beta and theta, high frontal coherence | 96–97% (sustained tension) |
Critical Self (EU¹⁵) | Guilt + Responsibility | Internal judgment, moral self-monitoring | DLPFC, OFC | Beta + gamma ↑, alpha suppressed | 96–97% (moral hyperalert) |
Chameleon (EU¹⁴) | Rejection + Belonging Desire | Extreme adaptation, need for social acceptance | TPJ, OFC | High theta/alpha in TPJ, emotional incoherence | 95–97% (social pressure) |
Caregiver (EU¹⁷) | Love + Fragility | Altruism with personal suffering | vmPFC, ACC | High theta/alpha, strong limbic connectivity | 94–96% (active compassion) |
Mourning Self (EU¹³) | Loss + Love | Emotional presence in the face of absence | vmPFC, S1/S2, ACC | Alpha/theta ↑ in medial and parietal regions | 93–95% (conscious grief) |
Flowing Self (EU²⁰) | Love + Belonging | Expanded awareness, inner peace and synchronicity | Medial PFC, PCC | Elevated alpha, smooth microstates, global cohesion | 94–95% (relaxed presence) |
Revolted Protector (EU²³) | Love + Injustice | Moral defense of others, purposeful action | DLPFC, ACC, OFC | Frontal beta/gamma, moral coherence | 95–96% (ethical activation) |
Inspirational Self (EU²¹) | Desire + Belonging | Empathic communication, connective leadership | TPJ, DLPFC | Alpha/theta in TPJ, mild frontal beta | 94–96% (creative presence) |
Self-Abandonment (EU¹⁷') | Love + Lack of Boundaries | Exhaustive giving, emotional depletion | vmPFC, ACC | High theta, weakened default mode connectivity | 92–94% (affective fatigue) |
Table 2 – Hyperoxygenated Selves: SpO₂ 99–100% (Bioaffective Alert)
Tensional Self (EU) | Bioaffective Origin | Why SpO₂ is High | Cortical Regions (via NIRS) | Expected EEG Patterns | Typical SpO₂ (at Rest) |
Panic Self (EU¹⁸) | Fear + Loss of Control | Acute hyperventilation → respiratory alkalosis | ↓ OxyHb in PFC, unstable ACC | Beta >30Hz, emotional incoherence | 100% (somato-emotional crisis) |
Superhero Self (EU¹⁹) | Desire + Omnipotence | Forced breathing to sustain idealized performance | DLPFC instability, hyperactive SMA | Elevated beta/gamma, functional rigidity | 99–100% (post-effort collapse) |
Paranoid Vigilant (EU²⁴) | Fear + Insecurity | Chronic hyperventilation due to constant alert state | ACC, DLPFC, diffuse perfusion | Beta + low gamma, unstable vigilance | 99–100% (chronic overalert) |
Martyr Self (EU¹⁷'') | Love + Self-punishment | Sacrificial and rigid breathing pattern → dissociation | Medial ACC, irregular PCC perfusion | Chaotic microstates, low affective connectivity | 99–100% (rigid self-sacrifice) |
Key NIRS/fNIRS Publications Supporting This Approach
1. Neuroaffectivity and Cognitive-Emotional States
- Scholkmann et al. (2014)
- "Short-term changes in the cortical hemodynamic response detected by functional near-infrared spectroscopy."
- Contribution: Demonstrates how rapid OxyHb/DeoxyHb (NIRS) fluctuations capture transitions between emotional states (e.g., Executor Self vs. Grieving Self).
- Holper et al. (2012)
- "Testing the validity of functional NIRS for cognitive and affective neuroscientific studies."
- Contribution: Validates NIRS for discriminating affective loads (e.g., fear in the Critical Self vs. love in the Caregiver Self).
2. Hyperventilation and SpO₂
- Kohl et al. (2020)
- "The effect of hyperventilation on cerebral hemodynamics and oxygenation measured by NIRS."
- Contribution: Shows that elevated SpO₂ (>98%) + decreased OxyHb (NIRS) indicates cerebral vasoconstriction (key for understanding Panic Self and Superhero Self).
3. NIRS-EEG Integration
- Wallois et al. (2012)
- "EEG-NIRS in epilepsy and neurovascular coupling."
- Contribution: Provides a model for correlating EEG microstates with hemodynamics (e.g., Flow Self shows PCC-medial PFC coupling).
- Dieler et al. (2012)
- "Functional NIRS-EEG during resting-state in humans."
- Contribution: Reveals how low-frequency EEG oscillations + NIRS identify Dissociative Selfhoods (e.g., Self-Abandonment Self).
4. Clinical Applications
- Ehlis et al. (2014)
- "Application of NIRS in psychiatry: monitoring prefrontal activation during cognitive tasks."
- Contribution: Links DLPFC hypoactivation (NIRS) to Rigid Selfhoods (e.g., Perfectionist Self).
Gaps and Opportunities*
- Lack of studies linking peripheral SpO₂ + cortical NIRS in real time.
- Mapping hemodynamic signatures of each Selfhood.
- Validating SpO₂ as a marker of existential states.
How to Use These Studies
1. Cite Kohl et al. (2020) to justify including SpO₂ in the model.
2. Use Holper et al. (2012) to support affective discrimination via NIRS.
3. Explore Wallois et al. (2012) to integrate EEG + NIRS in detecting Dynamic Selfhoods.

Functional Tensional Selves - NIRS EEG and SpO2

Hyperoxygenated Selves SpO2 99–100
Integrated Notes
SpO₂ between 94–97% indicates optimal balance of oxygen and CO₂ → associated with vasodilation, efficient cortical perfusion, and conscious functional presence.
SpO₂ ≥99% at rest often reflects hidden respiratory dysregulation (hyperventilation) → cerebral vasoconstriction, reduced oxygen delivery, and potential functional disorganization.
Interpreting SpO₂ requires NIRS and EEG correlation to determine whether the self is in a state of flow, tension, or masked breakdown.
DANA - Sexto Elemento ou Avatar
Futuros conceitos de Biosemiótica integrados às Neurociências
What If Peirce and Luria Had Access to Modern Neuroscience?
¿Qué habría pasado si Peirce y Luria hubieran tenido acceso a la neurociencia actual?
O que teríamos ganho com Peirce e Luria com acesso à neurociência moderna?
Análise de algumas Publicações Científicas no Contexto dos Eus Tensionais
Yoes Tensionales – NIRS, EEG y SpO₂
Tense Selfhoods – NIRS, EEG, and SpO₂
Eus Tensionais – NIRS, EEG e SpO₂
Tense Selfhoods – NIRS EEG SpO₂
EEG ERP EEG MicroStates EEG-fMRI BCI OHBM 2025 Fesbe Sbnec Sfn
#Decolonial
#Neuroscience
#DNAintelligence
#PeirceLuriaNow
#BioMarkersOfSelf
#EusTensionais
#NeuroEus
#EEGNIRSSpO2
#EEG
#NIRS
#SPO2
#OHBM
#Fesbe
#icmpc18
#Sbnec
#SfN
#DREXcidadão
#DREX