Neuroscience Perception Avatars
Neuroscience Perception Avatars
The depth of your question shapes what you will perceive next.
In evidence-based science, a “good question” is not just curiosity: it defines the slice of reality you will observe (time window, context, body, culture) and the kind of data that will make sense.
Why we use Avatars
Our Avatars / Elements / Illustrative Mascots exist for one simple (and powerful) reason:
when a researcher intentionally “stands in” a different avatar, they tend to ask different questions — and they tend to interpret the same dataset through different lenses.
That is not a flaw. It is a method.
Human behavior is multidimensional. Any study measures partials, not the whole.
Research captures behavioral reflections through signals and biosignals (EEG, fNIRS, SpO₂, HRV, GSR, movement, speech, video, etc.) inside a time window and a territory.
The avatar acts as a “slice-guide”: it helps decide what to ask, what to control, what to measure, and how to interpret.
We currently work with 08 avatars.
Connectomes in action: Paper–Rock–Scissors
We organize functional connectome modes as three operational states (linked to Kahneman’s “fast vs slow thinking,” as a practical metaphor):
Scissors — Prefrontal / “Think Slow”
More prefrontal recruitment
Cut, classify, register, catalog
Logic, planning, executive control
Great for method; risky when it becomes rigidity
Rock — Sensorimotor / “Think Fast”
More sensorimotor recruitment
Replicate the known (movement and/or cognition)
Habits, quick decisions, defense/attack/escape
Efficient; risky when it becomes autopilot
Paper — Fruition + Metacognition (Zone 2)
Fruition with metacognition (open, regulated, creative)
Attention broadens, the body stabilizes, belonging reorganizes choices
Supports high performance with psychological safety
Zones 1–2–3 (where these modes stabilize)
Zone 1: everyday life in task mode (functional mix of Scissors + Rock)
Zone 2: Paper (Fruition + metacognition), return to body and belonging
Zone 3: capture by rigid scripts/ideologies; interoception/proprioception get silenced (defensive Rock + rigid Scissors, without real Paper)
The 08 Avatars (revised definitions)
1) Brainlly (Jellyfish) — Living Neurodynamics of Perception
Represents: neurons + glia + blood (neurovascular coupling).
Typical questions: “What neurophysiological pattern accompanies this state?” “How do transitions Zone 1↔2 or Zone 3→2 show up in biosignals?”
Typical measures: EEG, fNIRS, SpO₂, pupil, reaction time.
2) Iam (Continuous lines) — Affect, Motivation, and 1st-person Consciousness
Represents: affective states, bonds, motivations, emotions and feelings shaping decisions and episodic memory.
Typical questions: “What regulates vs dysregulates this body?” “Which short emotion is sustaining a stable feeling?”
Typical measures: HRV, GSR, respiration, facial cues, brief self-report scales.
3) Olmeca (LatAm Anthropology) — Culture, Life History, and the Social Connectome
Represents: language, habits, rituals, education, class, trauma, cultural territory + development (with epigenetic bridges).
Typical questions: “What here is biography/culture?” “Why does the same stimulus mean different things across people?”
Typical tools: contextual tasks, short interviews, narrative analysis, sociocultural variables.
4) Yagé (States of Consciousness) — Mode Shifting and Applied Metacognition
Represents: noticing perception itself and flexing constructs (values, beliefs, principles).
Core function: the “gearbox” that helps identify and shift from rigid Rock/Scissors into Paper (Zone 2) when possible.
5) APUS — Body-Territory / Extended Proprioception
Represents: environment entering the body: posture, gravity, space, rhythm, breath, “territory as an extension of the body.”
Typical questions: “Which environmental factor reorganizes the body?” “How does territory reshape focus, emotion, and decision?”
Typical measures: movement/IMU, posture, breathing, HRV, trajectories in space.
6) Jiwasa — Synchrony/Desynchrony between DNAs in a Shared Task (same biome)
Represents: group-level coupling: coordination, conflict, cohesion, affect contagion, social timing.
Typical questions: “Is the group in collective Zone 2 or collective Zone 3?” “Where is synchrony real vs synchrony-by-pressure?”
Typical measures: hyperscanning (EEG/fNIRS), HRV/respiration synchrony, speech turn-taking metrics.
7) Math/Hep — Evidence-based Science: Relationship and Causality
Represents: experimental design, measurement, bias control, inference.
Key point: correlation is often not enough — the method must test causality when the question demands it.
Typical questions: “What do I manipulate?” “What outcome do I measure?” “Which control prevents self-deception?”
Rule: one testable hypothesis at a time (Hep = “1”).
Guiding line: Your body feels. Your brain learns. Science measures. Experiments test causality.
8) DANA (DNA Avatar) — DNA Intelligence and Living Organization in Territory
Represents: original biological intelligence inscribed in DNA, regulated by rhythms, environment, and biosocial belonging.
Direct bridges: with APUS (territory regulates expression/stability) and Jiwasa (shared-biome coupling modulates collective dynamics).
Typical questions: “What sustains regulation biologically?” “Which conditions keep Zone 2 plausible and stable over time?”
Keeping Avatars scientifically “alive”
To keep avatars as strong references in evidence-based science, each avatar maintains a living dossier of publications:
New relevant papers get attached to an avatar (or a bridge between avatars).
Math/Hep audits methods: variables, controls, limitations, correlation vs causality.
The avatar becomes a sharper lens: better questions, cleaner designs, clearer interpretations.
Minimal scientific base (why avatars exist)
WEIRD bias & generalization problem: Behavioral science often overgeneralizes from Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, Democratic samples, which can be non-representative of humanity.
Sampling bias is persistent (especially in development): High-impact developmental research remains heavily skewed toward WEIRD populations, motivating structural corrections in designs and interpretations.
Culture is under-modeled in brain development research: Developmental cognitive neuroscience has historically paid limited attention to cultural/ethnic variation (e.g., strong Western-country dominance in sampled publications).
Culture–Behavior–Brain loop: A formal framework supports the idea that culture shapes brain activity via behavior, and the brain feeds back into culture through behavioral influence—exactly the logic behind “multiple avatar lenses.”
Dialogical Multiplication / Indigenous psychology principles: A robust intercultural framework supports “listening without erasing the other,” aligning with Olmeca and the ethics of interpretation.
Decolonizing research methodologies: Research with Indigenous peoples is not politically neutral; decolonial methodology offers guardrails against epistemic erasure and extractive interpretation—strengthening Math/Hep’s bias-control commitments.
Colonización de la percepción en Navidad
Colonization of Perception at Christmas
Colonização da percepção no Natal
Avatares Neurocientíficos de Percepción
Neuroscience Perception Avatars
Avatares Neurocientíficos de Percepção
Tríada de la percepción navideña colonizada
Natal e economia do bioma: sair do dinheiro-dívida e entrar no crédito sem dívida (DREX Cidadão)
Natal Colonizado em Triplo Aspecto: Bioma, Yãy hã mĩy e Hiperespaço Mental

O Grande Conflito
#GrandeConflito
#BrasilAcimaDeTudo
#DeusPátriaFamília
#DeusAcimaDeTodos
#PIX
#DREX
#Deus
#Bíblia
#Jesus
#Fé
#Oração
#Evangelho
#PalavraDeDeus
#DREXcidadão