Jackson Cionek
48 Views

Neuroscience Perception Avatars

Neuroscience Perception Avatars

The depth of your question shapes what you will perceive next.
In evidence-based science, a “good question” is not just curiosity: it defines the slice of reality you will observe (time window, context, body, culture) and the kind of data that will make sense.


Why we use Avatars

Our Avatars / Elements / Illustrative Mascots exist for one simple (and powerful) reason:
when a researcher intentionally “stands in” a different avatar, they tend to ask different questions — and they tend to interpret the same dataset through different lenses.

That is not a flaw. It is a method.

  • Human behavior is multidimensional. Any study measures partials, not the whole.

  • Research captures behavioral reflections through signals and biosignals (EEG, fNIRS, SpO₂, HRV, GSR, movement, speech, video, etc.) inside a time window and a territory.

  • The avatar acts as a “slice-guide”: it helps decide what to ask, what to control, what to measure, and how to interpret.

We currently work with 08 avatars.


Connectomes in action: Paper–Rock–Scissors

We organize functional connectome modes as three operational states (linked to Kahneman’s “fast vs slow thinking,” as a practical metaphor):

Scissors — Prefrontal / “Think Slow”

  • More prefrontal recruitment

  • Cut, classify, register, catalog

  • Logic, planning, executive control

  • Great for method; risky when it becomes rigidity

Rock — Sensorimotor / “Think Fast”

  • More sensorimotor recruitment

  • Replicate the known (movement and/or cognition)

  • Habits, quick decisions, defense/attack/escape

  • Efficient; risky when it becomes autopilot

Paper — Fruition + Metacognition (Zone 2)

  • Fruition with metacognition (open, regulated, creative)

  • Attention broadens, the body stabilizes, belonging reorganizes choices

  • Supports high performance with psychological safety


Zones 1–2–3 (where these modes stabilize)

  • Zone 1: everyday life in task mode (functional mix of Scissors + Rock)

  • Zone 2: Paper (Fruition + metacognition), return to body and belonging

  • Zone 3: capture by rigid scripts/ideologies; interoception/proprioception get silenced (defensive Rock + rigid Scissors, without real Paper)


The 08 Avatars (revised definitions)

1) Brainlly (Jellyfish) — Living Neurodynamics of Perception

Represents: neurons + glia + blood (neurovascular coupling).
Typical questions: “What neurophysiological pattern accompanies this state?” “How do transitions Zone 1↔2 or Zone 3→2 show up in biosignals?”
Typical measures: EEG, fNIRS, SpO₂, pupil, reaction time.


2) Iam (Continuous lines) — Affect, Motivation, and 1st-person Consciousness

Represents: affective states, bonds, motivations, emotions and feelings shaping decisions and episodic memory.
Typical questions: “What regulates vs dysregulates this body?” “Which short emotion is sustaining a stable feeling?”
Typical measures: HRV, GSR, respiration, facial cues, brief self-report scales.


3) Olmeca (LatAm Anthropology) — Culture, Life History, and the Social Connectome

Represents: language, habits, rituals, education, class, trauma, cultural territory + development (with epigenetic bridges).
Typical questions: “What here is biography/culture?” “Why does the same stimulus mean different things across people?”
Typical tools: contextual tasks, short interviews, narrative analysis, sociocultural variables.


4) Yagé (States of Consciousness) — Mode Shifting and Applied Metacognition

Represents: noticing perception itself and flexing constructs (values, beliefs, principles).
Core function: the “gearbox” that helps identify and shift from rigid Rock/Scissors into Paper (Zone 2) when possible.


5) APUS — Body-Territory / Extended Proprioception

Represents: environment entering the body: posture, gravity, space, rhythm, breath, “territory as an extension of the body.”
Typical questions: “Which environmental factor reorganizes the body?” “How does territory reshape focus, emotion, and decision?”
Typical measures: movement/IMU, posture, breathing, HRV, trajectories in space.


6) Jiwasa — Synchrony/Desynchrony between DNAs in a Shared Task (same biome)

Represents: group-level coupling: coordination, conflict, cohesion, affect contagion, social timing.
Typical questions: “Is the group in collective Zone 2 or collective Zone 3?” “Where is synchrony real vs synchrony-by-pressure?”
Typical measures: hyperscanning (EEG/fNIRS), HRV/respiration synchrony, speech turn-taking metrics.


7) Math/Hep — Evidence-based Science: Relationship and Causality

Represents: experimental design, measurement, bias control, inference.
Key point: correlation is often not enough — the method must test causality when the question demands it.
Typical questions: “What do I manipulate?” “What outcome do I measure?” “Which control prevents self-deception?”
Rule: one testable hypothesis at a time (Hep = “1”).
Guiding line: Your body feels. Your brain learns. Science measures. Experiments test causality.


8) DANA (DNA Avatar) — DNA Intelligence and Living Organization in Territory

Represents: original biological intelligence inscribed in DNA, regulated by rhythms, environment, and biosocial belonging.
Direct bridges: with APUS (territory regulates expression/stability) and Jiwasa (shared-biome coupling modulates collective dynamics).
Typical questions: “What sustains regulation biologically?” “Which conditions keep Zone 2 plausible and stable over time?”


Keeping Avatars scientifically “alive”

To keep avatars as strong references in evidence-based science, each avatar maintains a living dossier of publications:

  1. New relevant papers get attached to an avatar (or a bridge between avatars).

  2. Math/Hep audits methods: variables, controls, limitations, correlation vs causality.

  3. The avatar becomes a sharper lens: better questions, cleaner designs, clearer interpretations.


Minimal scientific base (why avatars exist)

  • WEIRD bias & generalization problem: Behavioral science often overgeneralizes from Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, Democratic samples, which can be non-representative of humanity. 

  • Sampling bias is persistent (especially in development): High-impact developmental research remains heavily skewed toward WEIRD populations, motivating structural corrections in designs and interpretations. 

  • Culture is under-modeled in brain development research: Developmental cognitive neuroscience has historically paid limited attention to cultural/ethnic variation (e.g., strong Western-country dominance in sampled publications). 

  • Culture–Behavior–Brain loop: A formal framework supports the idea that culture shapes brain activity via behavior, and the brain feeds back into culture through behavioral influence—exactly the logic behind “multiple avatar lenses.” 

  • Dialogical Multiplication / Indigenous psychology principles: A robust intercultural framework supports “listening without erasing the other,” aligning with Olmeca and the ethics of interpretation. 

  • Decolonizing research methodologies: Research with Indigenous peoples is not politically neutral; decolonial methodology offers guardrails against epistemic erasure and extractive interpretation—strengthening Math/Hep’s bias-control commitments. 

 

Colonización de la percepción en Navidad

Colonization of Perception at Christmas

Colonização da percepção no Natal

Avatares Neurocientíficos de Percepción

Neuroscience Perception Avatars

Avatares Neurocientíficos de Percepção

Navidad, dinero-deuda y “economía del bioma”: por qué una CBDC minorista podría bajar la ansiedad social y mover el gasto hacia servicios

Navidad en el Hemisferio Sur: cómo el “guion” entra en mi cuerpo (y cómo recupero el sentir sin perder pertenencia)

Tríada de la percepción navideña colonizada

Christmas, Debt-Money, and a “Biome Economy”: why retail CBDC could reduce social anxiety (and shift spending toward services)

Christmas in the Global South: how a “script” enters my body (and how I reclaim my sensing without losing belonging)

A Colonized Christmas Perception in Triple Aspect: Biome Politics, Yãy hã mĩy, and the Mental Hyperspace of References

Natal e economia do bioma: sair do dinheiro-dívida e entrar no crédito sem dívida (DREX Cidadão)

Natal no Hemisfério Sul: como meu corpo aprende o roteiro e como eu recupero o sentir sem perder o pertencimento

Natal Colonizado em Triplo Aspecto: Bioma, Yãy hã mĩy e Hiperespaço Mental

O Grande Conflito
O Grande Conflito

#GrandeConflito
#BrasilAcimaDeTudo
#DeusPátriaFamília
#DeusAcimaDeTodos
#PIX
#DREX
#Deus
#Bíblia
#Jesus
#Fé
#Oração
#Evangelho
#PalavraDeDeus
#DREXcidadão





#eegmicrostates #neurogliainteractions #eegmicrostates #eegnirsapplications #physiologyandbehavior #neurophilosophy #translationalneuroscience #bienestarwellnessbemestar #neuropolitics #sentienceconsciousness #metacognitionmindsetpremeditation #culturalneuroscience #agingmaturityinnocence #affectivecomputing #languageprocessing #humanking #fruición #wellbeing #neurophilosophy #neurorights #neuropolitics #neuroeconomics #neuromarketing #translationalneuroscience #religare #physiologyandbehavior #skill-implicit-learning #semiotics #encodingofwords #metacognitionmindsetpremeditation #affectivecomputing #meaning #semioticsofaction #mineraçãodedados #soberanianational #mercenáriosdamonetização
Author image

Jackson Cionek

New perspectives in translational control: from neurodegenerative diseases to glioblastoma | Brain States